What corporate practice hinders the scaling of circular industrial models?
Reading Comprehension
Passage #67Read the following passage carefully to answer the question below
XAT VALR Passage 1: The Bio-Economics of Circular Supply Chains
The traditional linear economic model of 'take, make, dispose' has generated unprecedented ecological crises, characterized by accelerating resource depletion, sprawling landfills, and compounding greenhouse gas emissions. In response, ecological economists and industrial designers champion the paradigm of the circular economy, wherein material loops are closed through regenerative industrial processes, remanufacturing, and biological composting. Unlike linear systems that treat natural resources as infinite and waste as an externalized externality, circular supply chains view waste as a valuable feedstock for subsequent production cycles. This structural transition requires profound systemic innovation across product architecture, reverse logistics, and cross-industry material exchanges.
However, scaling circular industrial models encounters formidable economic and institutional friction. Consumer electronics and fast-moving consumer goods are frequently engineered for planned obsolescence rather than disassembly and repair, driven by corporate business models reliant on recurring replacement sales. Furthermore, regulatory frameworks and tax policies in many industrial nations disproportionately penalize secondary raw materials while subsidizing the extraction of virgin fossil fuels and raw minerals. Overcoming these barriers requires ambitious government interventions, including mandatory extended producer responsibility (EPR) legislation, standardized eco-design mandates, and targeted tax incentives for circular manufacturing.
Question
What corporate practice hinders the scaling of circular industrial models?