Loading course comparison...
Compare M.Com and M.Plan: eligibility, entrance exams, salaries, recruiters, and FAQs.
Based on salary, fees, return on fees, admission routes and career options. Figures are midpoints of the ranges reported across colleges.
M.Com graduates report a higher typical average salary (₹ 23.1 L vs ₹ 9.8 L for M.Plan). Its highest reported package goes up to ₹ 5.5 L.
M.Plan is the more affordable option (typical fees ₹ 3.9 L vs ₹ 4.7 L for M.Com). Government colleges bring it to about ₹ 2.2 L.
One year of average salary for M.Com covers about 4.9× its average fees, compared with 2.5× for M.Plan.
M.Com admits via MAH MBA CET, CBSE Class 12 Exam and 8+ more; M.Plan admits via GATE, CEED and 2 more.
Comes out ahead on the most parameters in this comparison.
A good pick if its strengths match your priorities.
Match the choice to what matters most to you.
M.Com leads on higher average salary (₹ 23.1 L) and better salary-to-fees ratio (4.9×). M.Plan has the edge on lower average fees (₹ 3.9 L). Weigh these against your eligibility, preferred entrance exams and career interests.
Key Metrics
Average Salary
₹ 23.1 L
Median Salary
₹ 18.0 L
Average Fees
₹ 60.0 - ₹ 9.5 L
Top Recruiters
Key Metrics
Average Salary
₹ 4.1 L - ₹ 15.6 L
Median Salary
₹ 1.6 L - ₹ 12.0 L
Average Fees
₹ 15.5 K - ₹ 7.7 L
Top Recruiters
—
For M.Com, the most frequently associated entrance exams (by programme–college hits) are: MAH MBA CET, CBSE Class 12 Exam, AIMA MAT, CUET, GUJCET, JEE Main, CUET PG, IUET, CAT, XAT. Figures aggregate active college–programme mappings across all colleges for each course.
For M.Plan, the most frequently associated entrance exams are: GATE, CEED, UGC NET, KIITEE. Figures aggregate active college–programme mappings across all colleges for each course.
M.Com shows a higher midpoint within its salary span (₹23,10,000) than M.Plan (₹4,08,000 – ₹15,60,000).
M.Plan has a lower midpoint within its fees span (₹15,467 – ₹7,65,000) than M.Com (₹60 – ₹9,46,000).
Both show the same most common duration: 2 years.
