Compare MPA and PGP: eligibility, entrance exams, salaries, recruiters, and FAQs.
Based on salary, fees, return on fees, admission routes and career options. Figures are midpoints of the ranges reported across colleges.
PGP graduates report a higher typical average salary (₹ 32.3 L vs ₹ 6.9 L for MPA).
MPA is the more affordable option (typical fees ₹ 2.3 L vs ₹ 20.3 L for PGP). Government colleges bring it to about ₹ 86.8 K.
One year of average salary for MPA covers about 3.0× its average fees, compared with 1.6× for PGP.
MPA admits via CUET; PGP admits via CAT, GRE and 5 more.
Comes out ahead on the most parameters in this comparison.
A good pick if its strengths match your priorities.
Match the choice to what matters most to you.
MPA leads on lower average fees (₹ 2.3 L) and better salary-to-fees ratio (3.0×). PGP has the edge on higher average salary (₹ 32.3 L). Weigh these against your eligibility, preferred entrance exams and career interests.
Key Metrics
Average Salary
₹ 3.6 L - ₹ 10.3 L
Median Salary
₹ 1.4 L - ₹ 18.0 L
Average Fees
₹ 2.5 K - ₹ 4.6 L
Top Recruiters
—
Key Metrics
Average Salary
₹ 32.3 L
Median Salary
₹ 4.0 L - ₹ 31.0 L
Average Fees
₹ 1.2 L - ₹ 39.4 L
Top Recruiters
For MPA, the most frequently associated entrance exams (by programme–college hits) are: CUET. Figures aggregate active college–programme mappings across all colleges for each course.
For PGP, the most frequently associated entrance exams are: CAT, GRE, GMAT, GATE, XAT, NMAT, AIMA MAT. Figures aggregate active college–programme mappings across all colleges for each course.
PGP shows a higher midpoint within its salary span (₹32,30,000) than MPA (₹3,60,000 – ₹10,29,000).
MPA has a lower midpoint within its fees span (₹2,454 – ₹4,64,900) than PGP (₹1,20,000 – ₹39,40,384).
The most common duration shown is 2 years for MPA and 1 year for PGP.